Concerning JLA/Avengers #2 ... [spoilers]

Non Star Trek: Star Wars, Firefly, BSG, Babylon 5, Stargate, etc.

Moderator: Dancyer McCoy

Forum rules
You are free to offer your opinions on a show, episode, book, film, film series, cinematic universe, etc., as long as it applies to that item, and not to the stated or assumed political views of the producers, writers, actors, key grip, best boy, intern, etc., of said item. In short, you want to talk about a show or movie, talk about the show or movie.

Others are free to disagree with your opinion. (You are not entitled to express your opinion in a vacuum.) BUT that opposing opinion must follow the same requirements above that the original opinion had to follow, as well as not bringing in the assumed political views of the original poster. (I leave out "stated" as they should not state any political position here on STPMA.)

ALSO, do not toss about derogatory labels at someone who offers an opinion in opposition to yours. No name calling, political labels (SJW, etc.,) questioning their humanity, morality, ethics, true fan status, or your assumption they are in the business to protect a certain fandom (gatekeeping, etc.). Again, discuss the show or movie not the politics or motives of another poster.

If you dislike something, it's perfectly fine to say so. However, posting your dislike every time someone else says anything positive about a show or movie, essentially stating the same thing over and over again is not acceptable. If you have something new to add, or are replying to a specific point in someone else's comment, okay. But if it's just to state once again, "IT SUCKS!" Don't.
Post Reply
Federation Ambassador
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 13861
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Pennsyltucky

Concerning JLA/Avengers #2 ... [spoilers]

Post by JM1776 » Tue Mar 27, 2007 3:53 pm

... in which Superman defeats Thor:

In a word ... no.

Now don't get me wrong: Could Superman win? Of course ... assuming Thor fights like the "bruiser with a bludgeon"---as he invariably does when written by Kurt Busiek, whose dislike of the character is apparent to anyone who's read enough Avengers.

Certainly if Thor and Superman mix it up via the simple expedient of trading blows, with a bit of lightning and some heat vision for pyrotechnics' effect, Kal will emerge the victor as often as not.

Once we get beyond the basics, though, the God of Thunder is literally so far beyond the Man of Steel that it's not even a genuine contest. This is a being who, at the peak of his powers, would have a fair chance against the Silver Age Superman---the one who flew through supernovae to clean his suit and could move planets out of their orbit. Those seem like unmatchable feats, until we remember Thor separating Surtur from the Sword of Twilight, piercing a Celestial's battle armor, bitch-slapping Juggernaut around for 59 seconds when it was apparent from context that 61 would have had ol' Cain in Dreamland, etc.

[Oh, and for those bright bulbs who point out, "Well, Superman can lift Thor's hammer," all that means is that Superman, augmented with Thor's power, can defeat Thor. A+B > A is basic arithmetic, not a freakin' revelation.]

Busiek's agenda, for whatever reason, was to have Superman defeat Thor. To accomplish this convincingly for the less perceptive, he had Thor lead with his chin (a "tactic" only Walt Simonson and a few others did not chronically indulge), do nothing to defend himself and use none ... repeat, none ... of his cosmic powers. 'Reality' check (assuming such a phrase has meaning in the comics): The writer had Thor wade into Superman's heat vision when he could have easily absorbed, or at least deflected, it with Mjolnir.

A properly-written Thor (and that's the key) is more than a match for the Sentry ... the Silver Surfer ... Superman ...

... or, frankly, any super-hero we've yet seen.
I have slowly become convinced that Rafael Nadal's twelve French Open titles in fourteen years is the single greatest achievement in sports history.

Post Reply