Just saw this tonight. Never seen it before but I suspect they never used Voyager as a category after this. I wonder if the guy who suggested it caught grief over it?
Pathetic Star Trek Jeopardy
Moderator: Dancyer McCoy
Forum rules
You are free to offer your opinions on a show, episode, book, film, film series, cinematic universe, etc., as long as it applies to that item, and not to the stated or assumed political views of the producers, writers, actors, key grip, best boy, intern, etc., of said item. In short, you want to talk about a show or movie, talk about the show or movie.
Others are free to disagree with your opinion. (You are not entitled to express your opinion in a vacuum.) BUT that opposing opinion must follow the same requirements above that the original opinion had to follow, as well as not bringing in the assumed political views of the original poster. (I leave out "stated" as they should not state any political position here on STPMA.)
ALSO, do not toss about derogatory labels at someone who offers an opinion in opposition to yours. No name calling, political labels (SJW, etc.,) questioning their humanity, morality, ethics, true fan status, or your assumption they are in the business to protect a certain fandom (gatekeeping, etc.). Again, discuss the show or movie not the politics or motives of another poster.
If you dislike something, it's perfectly fine to say so. However, posting your dislike every time someone else says anything positive about a show or movie, essentially stating the same thing over and over again is not acceptable. If you have something new to add, or are replying to a specific point in someone else's comment, okay. But if it's just to state once again, "IT SUCKS!" Don't.
You are free to offer your opinions on a show, episode, book, film, film series, cinematic universe, etc., as long as it applies to that item, and not to the stated or assumed political views of the producers, writers, actors, key grip, best boy, intern, etc., of said item. In short, you want to talk about a show or movie, talk about the show or movie.
Others are free to disagree with your opinion. (You are not entitled to express your opinion in a vacuum.) BUT that opposing opinion must follow the same requirements above that the original opinion had to follow, as well as not bringing in the assumed political views of the original poster. (I leave out "stated" as they should not state any political position here on STPMA.)
ALSO, do not toss about derogatory labels at someone who offers an opinion in opposition to yours. No name calling, political labels (SJW, etc.,) questioning their humanity, morality, ethics, true fan status, or your assumption they are in the business to protect a certain fandom (gatekeeping, etc.). Again, discuss the show or movie not the politics or motives of another poster.
If you dislike something, it's perfectly fine to say so. However, posting your dislike every time someone else says anything positive about a show or movie, essentially stating the same thing over and over again is not acceptable. If you have something new to add, or are replying to a specific point in someone else's comment, okay. But if it's just to state once again, "IT SUCKS!" Don't.
-
collierctr
- Vice Admiral
- Posts: 3094
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:10 am
- Location: Sol system south of the asteroid belt
Pathetic Star Trek Jeopardy
"THERE IS NO SANCTUARY!"
-
collierctr
- Vice Admiral
- Posts: 3094
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:10 am
- Location: Sol system south of the asteroid belt
Re: Pathetic Star Trek Jeopardy
These folks aren't perfect but they do much better...
"THERE IS NO SANCTUARY!"
-
Captain Marshal
- Commander
- Posts: 1059
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:34 am
- Location: NY
Re: Pathetic Star Trek Jeopardy
The first one was absolutely horrible. Confirms my suspicions that kids these days have a horrible taste in pop culture. The second was a balm to my despair, making me have hope that there are those who know what the good stuff is.
Good job collierctr for finding these and putting it up for us to see. You should put a warning label though on the first: "those with weak hearts should avoid watching this unless they wish to suffer disappointment and despair at the youth of today."
Good job collierctr for finding these and putting it up for us to see. You should put a warning label though on the first: "those with weak hearts should avoid watching this unless they wish to suffer disappointment and despair at the youth of today."
Always fight for the dream of a better tomorrow, one that future generations will be proud to inherit.
Any dream worthy of fighting for is worth dying for. But anything worth dying for is also worth LIVING for.
Never stop fighting back the darkness or else it will overwhelm you. Faith Manages.
Any dream worthy of fighting for is worth dying for. But anything worth dying for is also worth LIVING for.
Never stop fighting back the darkness or else it will overwhelm you. Faith Manages.