Asked for my brief critique of Discovery

Star Trek related discussion, information, links, etc.

Moderator: Dancyer McCoy

Forum rules
You are free to offer your opinions on a show, episode, book, film, film series, cinematic universe, etc., as long as it applies to that item, and not to the stated or assumed political views of the producers, writers, actors, key grip, best boy, intern, etc., of said item. In short, you want to talk about a show or movie, talk about the show or movie.

Others are free to disagree with your opinion. (You are not entitled to express your opinion in a vacuum.) BUT that opposing opinion must follow the same requirements above that the original opinion had to follow, as well as not bringing in the assumed political views of the original poster. (I leave out "stated" as they should not state any political position here on STPMA.)

ALSO, do not toss about derogatory labels at someone who offers an opinion in opposition to yours. No name calling, political labels (SJW, etc.,) questioning their humanity, morality, ethics, true fan status, or your assumption they are in the business to protect a certain fandom (gatekeeping, etc.). Again, discuss the show or movie not the politics or motives of another poster.

If you dislike something, it's perfectly fine to say so. However, posting your dislike every time someone else says anything positive about a show or movie, essentially stating the same thing over and over again is not acceptable. If you have something new to add, or are replying to a specific point in someone else's comment, okay. But if it's just to state once again, "IT SUCKS!" Don't.
Post Reply
JM1776
Federation Ambassador
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 13862
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Pennsyltucky
Contact:

Asked for my brief critique of Discovery

Post by JM1776 » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:07 am

Answered thus:
You have every right to enjoy/be entertained by this series and think it’s “great”. People like what they like. (Why we like certain things I’ll leave to the psychologists.)

If, however, you think Discovery is great Star Trek, well …

The term I use for both it and Abrams-Trek is TiNA: Trek In Name Alone. Arguably, it’s “Star Trek” (and I use that name looser than an Orion hooker) for the ADHD generation of morally-challenged twerps.

When a series is so thematically and structurally antithetical to the spirit of its predecessors, lengthy criticism is unnecessary. On the eye test, and in the truly beating heart, Discovery is not Star Trek. End of conversation.
"Whenever I've heard Richard Dawkins speak, two things become very clear: 1. Richard Dawkins absolutely believes in God; 2. Richard Dawkins is quite angry with Him." – Anonymous, posting as Gebre Menfes Kidus

User avatar
Bry_Sinclair
Fleet Captain
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1912
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 1:53 am
Location: Lerwick, Shetland, Scotland

Re: Asked for my brief critique of Discovery

Post by Bry_Sinclair » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:44 pm

Here here!
Avatar: Captain Reihyn, Commanding Officer, U.S.S. Orion (circa 2375)
Artist: FltCpt. Bossco

User avatar
amehatrekkie
-the weird one-
-the weird one-
Posts: 10553
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:53 pm
Location: Earth, North American Continent, Southeast USA

Re: Asked for my brief critique of Discovery

Post by amehatrekkie » Mon Apr 02, 2018 8:23 pm

i call it an STD; the name fits since it's an infection on the franchise.
Ahmie K-[ay][aka Adam Kriegel], Captain of the Department of Weird yea i'm weird
STPMA WORLDBUILDING EXPERT[ RIP MJ!!] Normal people scare meAging is inevitable, maturity is optional
https://imgur.com/a/bUvNm

User avatar
captainuniverse
Federation Attaché
Federation Attaché
Posts: 7370
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 3:29 pm
Location: Washington State
Contact:

Re: Asked for my brief critique of Discovery

Post by captainuniverse » Tue Apr 03, 2018 1:35 am

The new generation has broken it. Fix it.
"All of Time and Space; everywhere and anywhere; every star that ever was. Where do you want to start?"

"Geronimo!"

Thanks to FltCpt. Bossco for my Tattok avatar. This is Tattok when he assumed the position of Commander-in-Chief, Starfleet in the year 2411.

User avatar
Drake
Plain Old Captain
Plain Old Captain
Posts: 833
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 8:32 pm
Location: USS Vanguard NCC-91000 (currently operating in the Florida sector)
Contact:

Re: Asked for my brief critique of Discovery

Post by Drake » Mon May 14, 2018 2:26 pm

TINA covers it well. I admit to being a cranky curmudgeon whose warp core doesn't extend all the way to the top, but I stopped watching the new movies after the first one and will not pay to see the new series. Your mileage may very.
“I wish to have no connection with any ship that does not sail fast; for I intend to go in harms way.” – John Paul Jones

"Ooops... the navigator just told me I'm drifting off subject again. Damn my old thrusters!"

Chomh sean leis an cheo agus níos sine faoi dhó. (As old as the mist and older by two.)

User avatar
Gazomg
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 2079
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:11 am
Location: The Emerald Isle
Contact:

Re: Asked for my brief critique of Discovery

Post by Gazomg » Tue May 15, 2018 11:00 am

Unlike most forums on here you can give your opinion more freely than most other trek forums that are over populated with snowflake morons

I gave my opinion on discovery on another forum and because I said Tilly was too heavy to be a cadet, which broke no rules I was accused of trolling.
Snowflake mods love to use that as an excuse to ban people who have a different opinion to their but have broke no rule.

As to my quick overall opinion, I thought discovery was far better than i expected.
That said not exactly my idea of proper trek as the jury is still out on that.
Loved lorca, hated georgiou, loved stamets, hated the klingons look.
The main cast is thin on depth, harry mudd was decent
Image
MANIPULATIONS ON MY SITE - 2,430 - July 21st

Post Reply