Star Trek: Lower Decks

[Ronin]

I don't think they've declared the original animated series canon yet.

[JM1776]

Only elements of "Yesteryear" are considered canon, insofar as I know.

And the vastly inferior Star Trek: Discovery may have overturned that.

The second episode is less cute than the first. It's already losing its luster.

[sirus]

Have they declared that this is canon?

Canon is dead.

But yeah. I've seen it. If Picard is too dark and brutal to be Star Trek, Lower Decks is too stupid. These characters make the whole of Starfleet look bad. I can't stand any of them. Honestly with this I think I am mostly over Star Trek. It used to be fun, but I find it hard to even watch classic Trek without the new shows invading my mind.

Put simply, this 3rd era of Trek sucks.

[JM1776]

I have to be honest.

The show is growing on me. I enjoy it far more than I did Picard or Discovery.

[jonarus]

So far I am loving this show. I didn't think I would, because I was not a fan of Rick and Morty, but this has been scratching an itch I did not know I had.

[Ronin]

It feels more like Final Space to me... but that's just me.

[JM1776]

I did confirm, by the way: Star Trek: Lower Decks is canon.

[Gazomg]

Put simply, this 3rd era of Trek sucks.

the abrams movies are utter pish

Picard started well and fell off a cliff

discovery is completely dominated by the awful Burnham

And as for the cartoon that seems like its aimed at people with a short attention spam, it is woeful.

The Orville is better than the lot of them.

[Joseph A Human]

I haven't actually seen any of Lower Decks yet, still this is funny.

[JM1776]

And as for the cartoon that seems like its aimed at people with a short attention spam, it is woeful.

And yet here I am, with an attention span marginally superior to that of a gnat, daring to think that it's far from woeful.

It's without question more entertaining than Picard or Discovery, in my opinion. Such may be a low bar, but Lower Decks clears it with ease.

Note that there are three errors in your above quote. Perhaps your attention span would be better suited to correcting your comments before you post them.

You don't like something? State why. Don't make cracks at the people who do like it.

[Michael]

You don't like something? State why. Don't make cracks at the people who do like it.

That's a good rule of thumb regardless of the topic being discussed.

[Gazomg]

And as for the cartoon that seems like its aimed at people with a short attention spam, it is woeful.

And yet here I am, with an attention span marginally superior to that of a gnat, daring to think that it's far from woeful.

It's without question more entertaining than Picard or Discovery, in my opinion. Such may be a low bar, but Lower Decks clears it with ease.

Note that there are three errors in your above quote. Perhaps your attention span would be better suited to correcting your comments before you post them.

You don't like something? State why. Don't make cracks at the people who do like it.

there is an error in your post as well.

You made the mistake of thinking I care what you think.

[Ronin]

You are making a post on a forum thread to put your words out into the world so they can be reviewed by others and reflected upon.

Either you care what other people think or you think your thoughts are important enough that there needs to be a public record.

[Gazomg]

edit..

why bother

[sirus]

Honestly, I just can't get into it. I just don't give a crap about the story. Maybe it's just me. It's just not what I'm looking for from a Star Trek show. Glad others can enjoy it. I'll just stay hyped for more Orville.